The Fujifilm 50-140 LM OIS WR- a first look

The Fujifilm 50-140 LM OIS WR- a first look

 Tiwai Smelter at dawn, Bluff, New Zealand

Fujifilm X-T1, 50-140/2.8 LM OIS WR
ISO200, 1/35s @ f8



Completing the Total Trifecta


I am sorry, but gear does matter. Especially if you are a Pro.

Nikon owners talk about the Holy Trinity. In my brief experience with a D800, I used all 3 lenses.  They are, after all, the basis of the standard kit for a working photographer. Most of what we are asked to shoot will involve using one or more of them. The 14-24/2.8 was stellar, a genuine match for the camera’s humongous sensor. The 70-200/2.8 VRII was very good, apart from the fact that it vignetted badly at f10 at 200mm, and the 24-70/ 2.8 is best not discussed. The 5 different versions I tried were all mushy in the corners at any focal length and any aperture.

Until now Fujifilm really haven’t had a Holy Trinity of their own. When they first introduced the X-Pro 1 it came with the classic 3 prime lenses; a 28, 50 and 90mm equivalent. It was a brave move and one which had a lot of people scratching their heads. WTF? However for a camera which was, in effect, going up against the Leica rangefinder gestalt, it was in my opinion, a logical move.

Fujifilm have continued to round out the lens range with primes, and zooms have come later.

The game changer for them seems to have been the introduction of the X-T1, their first mirrorless DSLR, which has really lit a brushfire for them and become an instant hit. Many of my friends (almost all in fact) have dumped their Canikon kits in toto, and downsized to the Fuji, without any loss of quality, but a real saving in weight and chiropractor’s bills. As any wedding photographer will tell you, after a 12-hour day, holding a 5D MK III with battery grip and 70-200/2.8L, your arms are dragging on the ground. It is hard physical work. Your arms ache and your tendons are on fire.

I had only had the new 50-140 LM OIS WR (76-213mm FF equivalent) in my hands for 12 hours when I decided to post a pic on FaceBook. Within seconds, it seemed, F. leapt onto the post. Is it any good, he asked? I was in the middle of a shoot for a client so my reply was brief.


Do I want one?


I went back to work. I know F has been holding out for this lens for quite some time. When I rang him a couple of days later, I told him to order one.

Already done, mate. Now I just have to wait.


In use

Fujifilm New Zealand had just the one sample in the country, which they were taking around the dealers, but they gave it a break and freighted it down to me, to use for a couple of days. It isn’t a production sample, they hastily added, so don’t expect too much.

Not that I would have known.

20141106_191915 When I unwrapped it, the first thing that struck me was the size. It is big for a Fujifilm lens. And heavy. The obvious comparison is with the very good 55-200 LM OIS. The former weighs in at 995gm vs. the latter’s 580gm. The 55-200 varies in length between 118mm and 177mm, depending on your choice of focal length, while the 50-140 is a constant 175.9mm, a result of its constant internal focusing design. The image at right, snapped on my smartphone on the bonnet of my 4×4 truck will give an idea of the relative size difference.

It uses a 72mm filter, and comes with a tripod collar, which it definitely needs. The front element uses Fujifilm’s HT-EBC (High Transmittance Electron Beam Coating) to reduce ghosting and flare. Read more here. With only two days and on a schedule, I really didn’t have time to test this out. Later perhaps.

Of greater interest was the fact that it is the second lens in the Fujifilm range to get the WR (Water Resistant) designation. Paired with the X-T1 this means that you don’t have to Nana it on a job by using an umbrella, or a shower cap pinched from the last motel you stayed in. Further confirmation that its designers had pros in mind.

It is built like the proverbial masonry outhouse. The mounts are all machined brass, and the barrel and rings metal as well. Contrary to popular (enthusiast) belief, pros don’t change their gear every 10 minutes. These are working tools and their value is measured in terms of their income-generating ability. A pro will usually keep kit for years, until it is falling to bits and only then replace it. Any change decision must make economic sense. Otherwise it simply doesn’t happen. My impression of the 50-140 is that it is built to take years of hard work. The finish will wear off and the brass will show through honourably, but the lens will keep on delivering.

The second thing which struck me was the stabilisation. Fujifilm claim it is their best yet, capable of 5 stops of stabilisation. I really didn’t have time to test this out, and anyway I was working, so the job came first. I had a shot to make, and a strong Southland wind was blowing, so I opted to handhold. I framed and took up the first pressure. And the image simply stopped moving. I shook my head and tried again. The same eerie stillness. I made and exposure and pressed the review button. Then I pushed the focus assist button to check how good my shot was.

When had glued my eyeballs back in I had another look. I made another exposure. The focus assist is a demanding taskmaster. The slightest amount of camera shake will show in slightly-mushed detail. I zoomed in and scrolled around the image. Every trace of microdetail was there, rendered in exquisite sharpness, even in the corners. Without a tripod. Wow!

I fully expected it to feel unbalanced with all that weight hanging out the front of the diminutive X-T1. However it doesn’t. It sits nicely in the hand, and all the controls fall where they should.

Focus is superfast, on par with any of the Big Boys’ 70-200/2.8 RPGs. I borrowed a friend’s 70-200/2.8L Red Ring to compare. Yep. Just as fast. Sports togs can now compete.

The last feature worth mentioning, and by no means the least, is that Fujifilm have put back the aperture ring on the lens barrel. This is a biggie for me, because I tend to work mostly in aperture-priority. I choose and select an aperture, and then use the exposure compensation dial to adjust the histogram. Having to fiddle-guess the aperture by watching the LCD or EVF is a pain, one more thing I have to think about when I am concentrating on the image. Well done, Mr. Fuji. This working pro thanks you.



So there we have it. Two legs of the Total Trifecta; the stellar 10-24 LM OIs , which leaves the 16-35/2.8L (Mk I or II) dead in the water in terms of edge-to-edge sharpness; and the 50-140 LM OIS WR.

Next year we get the 16-55/2.8 R WR, the third leg of the TT,  and a rash of pro flashes instead of the Matchbox Toys on offer at the moment. Now all we need is a shift lens of some sort (40mm FF equiv. would be perfect).

Then I might go back to shooting weddings.

No. Not really.



A friend asked me what kit I would take if I was doing a job either in-country or offshore.


A brace of X-T1’s, one of which would be the Graphite model, so I  could instantly tell them apart, both equipped with battery grips and about 6 extra batteries (and chargers, along with a power board); a pro flash or two; the Total Trifecta; an X100T with both conversion lenses; the 23/1.4, 35/1.4 and 56/1.2 primes; and a carbon tripod of some sort.

All of which would be just as good and a whole lot cheaper and lighter than the same thing in Canikony.

20 Responses

  1. Bruce says:

    Thanks Tony. I know what I will be doing!

  2. Hello. Could you test the tracking capabilities of XT1 and this tele zoom? is important to me know if can be used to tracking football players. And is useful this lens with the old X Pro 1, taking in account that is for mainly OVF use because the EVF sucks.

  3. Tony Bridge says:

    Hi Hernan:
    sadly it has gone back and I iwllnt be able to do anything to help until I get my hands on one, potentially later this month. However I owuld guess that , given its speed and the fact that the tracking with the 55-200 is very fast and accurate, that it would be suitable.
    I certainly wouldn’t try to shoot sport with the X-Pro 1…

  4. Noel Butcher says:

    I wish I hadn’t read your review of the 50-140 lens. I have one on order and your review simply makes me more frustrated that it hasn’t arrived yet.
    I used to work professionally, using Canon for the last 18 or so years of that gig. I bought my X-Pro1 and three lenses on the basis of seeing some large (approx1.2 metres wide) prints taken with the X-Pro1 and the X-100 by Michael Coyne.
    I found the X-Pro 1 quirky but I loved it and the quality of the lenses. I had no hesitation buying the X-T1 without having held one (and for the record, I LOVE the electronic viewfinder in this camera).
    I also have no qualms whatsoever about ordering the 50-140 unseen as Fuji have firmly cemented themselves as makers of seriously great lenses. Anyone for a bag of used Canon gear?
    Cheers NoelB.

  5. Russ McLean says:

    Does that mean Sir Tony, that if one still shoots Canon that we are not friends anymore?

  6. Tony Bridge says:

    No Sir Russ
    We can still be friends.

  7. Lynn clayton says:

    Tony, I have major trouble reading your blog on an iPad… Is this a responsive blogsite? The print is very small and it is difficult to enlarge – I will try and read when next on my PC but I suspect there is a set up problem?? Or is it my iPad only?? Cheers.

  8. Tony Bridge says:

    Thanks for the heads-up Lynn. I don’t own an iPad (nor do I ever intend to do so!). As far as I know the site is responsive.
    Let me look into it!

  9. […] Fujifilm 50-140 LM OIS WR- a first look at thistonybridge: “Focus is superfast, on par with any of the Big Boys’ 70-200/2.8 RPGs. I borrowed a […]

  10. habe praktisch alles was auf den Markt in den letzten 3 Jahren gekommen ist.Ob Oly oder Sony…
    Auch die X-T1 hatte ich ausprobiert.
    Mus mich immer wieder wundern wie weit die Klüft zwischen den Lobungen für die Spiegellosen und den tatsächlihen Ergebnissen und Erfahrungen ist…
    möchte hierzu nichts schreiben- ist ja sinnlos…
    Nur ab und zu mal selber preislich vergleichen was ein Set von zum Beispiel bestehend aus Canon 6D+ EF 85 1.8+ 24-70 2,8 von Tamron+70 200 2,8 VC Tamron und einem Vergleichbaren Set aus Sony A/ oder Fuji XT oder Olympus E-M1….mit dazugehörigen ähnlichen Objektiven.Mann wird ganz schnel nüchter feststellen das es keines Falls günstiger und garnicht so schwer ist…das Canoniken Set;) Und versuchen Sie doch eine Set aus Canon 6D+85 1.8 +70-200 4 L IS +24-105IS L zu übertrümfen?
    Nichts annäherndes werden Sie ,gemessen an an Qualität +Preis ,finden.Nur am Gewicht werden Sie gleich liegen.
    So einfach ist die Rechnung.
    Es sei den Sie suchen nicht Bildqualitative Talente, sondern Bedienungs Komfort und Spielereien, ja , dan ist die spiegellose Welt ganz anders.
    Und von den Teleobjektiven was Canikon anbietet, sind die Spiegellose noch lichtjahre entfernt.

    Summa sumarum -direckt die Systeme zu vergleichen ist falsch! Indireckt, gemessen an seine Bedürfnisse und Einsatz gebiet-ist richtig.,Da wo es mit leichterem gepäck möglich ist-mitnehmen.Da wo man ein 600mm und folformat braucht-da nimt man eine canikon mit.
    In meiner Fototasche leben friedlich mitteinander Canon und Sony …
    Konflickte gab es bis heute keine;)

  11. PASCAL Philippe says:

    As a non-pro and passionate, i’m looking more and more at Fuji 😉
    And your review, especially some points about colors and hardware quality, are pushing me further in this direction. Of course, for now, i will not buy an expansive X-T1 + lenses. It is not a good investment…for someone not selling pictures 😀
    To me, there are few brands giving amazing colors punch straight from sensor (i mean…not spending hours on a raw software with thousand profiles) : Fuji and Olympus.
    I’m pretty sure a lot of Olympus OM-D users send in-camera jpegs to their clients, too 😉
    Thanks for you review ! You are selling Fuji better than themselves 😀

  12. Noel Butcher says:

    Re Lynn’s comments about the iPad. Tony’s blog/site works fine on an Android tablet, no problem enlarging the text if need be.

  13. Richard says:

    Is that a typo, or are you saying the focus is fast enough for sports because it is as fast as the 24 year old 80-200 2.8L which is much slower than the more modern 70-200 2.8L? Granted, being as fast as the 80-200 would be a big improvement for Fuji, but it still wouldn’t be a competitive option for sports photographers.

  14. […] first look for the XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR mid-range zoom lens can be seen at thistonybridge website […]

  15. Tony Bridge says:

    Oops. Thanks for pointing that out Richard.Yes it is a typo. I meant of course the 70-200 2.8L IS. On a 5D Mk III.
    Will make the necessary correction!

  16. Richard says:

    Sweet! I was expecting a response that said “well, the 80-200 2.8 was fast enough to get the job done.” Amazed to hear it’s as fast as the 70-200 2.8L!

  17. Great article and it had me wanting to see the image you described. Can you send it to my email please.

  18. Jurgen Suppan says:

    I took this lens to Antarctica with my X-T1. Shooting from a moving Zodiac with great results, the OIS combined low noise at higher ISO produced some stunning photos, tack sharp (not as good as on a tripod, you would still be able to spot the difference, but stunning considering the situation). That was only topped by the 10-24mm (I took two bodies, one mounted with the 50-140 the other with the 10-24 to avoid lens changes in Antarctic weather conditions, that worked great as I was always prepared for the next opportunity). The only downside was that the 50-140 lens broke off from the body on the way back home when I accidentally dropped my bag in the airport. The screws are just screwed into plastic and are not able to take a lot of force, may be that is intentionally to protect the body in case of a fall. So I learned not to leave this lens mounted to the body..

  19. phillip says:

    sorry, I haven’t read all the blogs on the post – but completely agree with Fuji X-T2 and the lenses, but only since ON1 came out with the 2018 version…it is simply amazing what this software does with your fuji raw files

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

All original content on these pages is fingerprinted and certified by Digiprove